This is another common complaint that I often hear. I think that we need to first of all define what science is. The definition of science is systematized knowledge derived from observation and study.I think that they are trying to equivocate the evolution theory with science and are trying to say that if you reject evolution, you reject science. There are six meanings to the word evolution when used in scientific discussions https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9yrrDJ1Tdc&list=PLvFrrGonrTSOO8_ZtChPQrBxx4MSla9Qb&index=5. This question commits the fallacy of complex question by assuming that creationists are against science and incorporating the assumption as part of the question.They could reword the question by asking; are creationists against science, if so, why? This could go into yet another rabbit trail by asking the question; how is science even possible in the evolutionist world view? I might coveer that in another article.
|
Wyatt MickasArchives
September 2016
Categories |